Jim, to clarify, I don't mean that everyone liked it. It was kind of like in the 70's and 80's where you couldn't get fired by going with IBM. There were definitely some red flags at the time, but there was enough other stuff (Sienna, NC game appearance, his admitting he had made mistakes at GT) to be swayed. I'm not saying it was even the best decision given the situation at the time, but at least there was enough that you could defend the hire to those you report to. I respect that you may still not be convinced it was defensible, though. Obviously, hindsight is 20/20 at this point...
My main point is that ff we focus on whether or not it was a bad choice in the first place, we will get distracted into that debate, instead of focusing on a discussion on what to do to right this sinking ship.