That would be one way of thinking. Another would be to understand progress takes time.
My biggest frustration with our fan base is that we do not always appreciate progress and tend to have unrealistic expectations. We expect instant gratification. Now you personally may still show up, but the majority of fans/students don’t want to suffer through growing pains. If we as a fan base don’t show up and keep a decent atmosphere through these times, then we are shooting ourselves in the foot.
More than facilities or uniforms or whatever else, I think recruits care most about the gameday atmosphere. They put in all the hours of work and practice for the satisfaction they get from hearing the roar of the crowd.
We’ve made huge strides in ‘artificially’ (for lack of a better word) creating a better gameday experience. Still, without fans in the stands, the atmosphere can only get but so good. And DJ3, I think your way of thinking keeps many people away from our games, compounding the problem exponentially.
I agree that the most competitive and star players want to play on the biggest stage. And we won’t get those types until we start winning and return to the “the big stage.” We all have to accept that having a full arena and large crowd in Fairfax relies on fair weather attendance. Our players/recruits won’t hear the “roar of the crowd” if they aren’t winning.
The crowds will come back when we are consistently good. Which, hopefully, means an easier time recruiting. And we’ll have a full team and skill set.
I want to clarify your logic a little though. Because if the process takes too long and there is suffering then there’s likely to be a small crowd. Your argument seems to imply that we’ll never get good recruits because we’ll never have big crowds without the causal fan who wants to see a winner, which Is the part I see as a bit faulty and I don’t think you meant it negatively.
So, for those who see signs of disaster right now....
First, there has to be something that gets us back at the top. And I think the way Paulsen is going about it is the best we can do. He’s recruiting highly competitive kids who want to win, but also don’t have over inflated egos. You can see it in the way they play. These kids are not used to losing and want to be a part of building something bigger. That’s all Paulsen can do at this point, sell recruits on a bigger vision for Mason basketball.
Are they sometimes overmatched? Sure, right now we can’t always compete and the lack of depth is something that can be legitimately criticized. I don’t fault people for that.
As others mentioned, it took laranaga a while to get us where we were, which may be why this is so frustrating for some (especially if you’re a post 2006 Mason student/alum). We knew what we had and it just slipped away and the thought of waiting that long is daunting (especially after seeing a complete train wreck from Hewitt).
Personally, l really enjoy watching this team over the last three years and think that the quality of the kids is outstanding (not necessarily their skill levels). Also, the approach to basketball from this administration is way better than before.
Could this all tank and Paulsen is a bust? Sure. It’s healthy to be skeptical. But I don’t think that being thin this year is a death signal that is leading me to think that, yet.
In ideal world we would pick up where we left off last year. But it doesn’t work like that, especially for a program that’s trying to find its way back to the top tier. Losing sucks and I want to go back to when we were going to be a preseason top 25 team and we had expectations to start making the tournament every year, but it ain’t happening.
If we have two or three disappointing years in a row (expectations, not necessarily record wise), and it’s obvious that Dave’s neckties have some really small knots, then hell yeah I’ll be on the freakout bandwagon. At least for right now though Dave’s ties are pretty loose and I like it.