I get that people didn’t like Paulsen’s personality, but it’s not like English has on the court fundamentally done any better after two seasons than Paulsen did.
Let’s keep in mind that Paulsen had a 20 win season in year two as well. And yeah he finished 9-9 and 7th that year in the A10, but the A10 in 2017 was WAY better than it was last year with three NCAA teams (Dayton, URI, vcu), and a Richmond team that made the NIT quarterfinals (in other words, the top 4 was a gauntlet in a way this year’s wasn’t even close to being).
And to say English did more than Paulsen ever did with the same recruits forget that Paulsen also went 11-7 in a down year in the A10 and lost a quarterfinal game badly (although not 30 points and to the eventual winners of the conference that season).
I get Paulsen was a big of a dud personality wise (he rubbed me the wrong way too, not knowing him personally) and we are all caught up in English’s much more dynamic and charismatic person and we love the recruits he’s brought in, but let’s not pretend he’s taken us anywhere yet.
With today’s environment even if English took us to the tournament and even to the second weekend, most of those players would bolt after he left anyway. Him leaving now or later changes nothing about the fundamentals of this job. You want it to be more attractive? We need phase II, something needs to be done about the EBA, we need more money for assistants, analytics, rehab, more and better charters, etc.