Umm how does that math work? .571to .611. In conference .591 to .606 5th place to 6th place. Strange!
Pretty simple, actually. Paulson finished 4th in the a-10 in his last season. English has never finished better than 5th.
The thing is though, I like English. I hope he stays and I hope he succeeds. The issue is that you seem to believe there is some sort of proven model for winning at Mason, and that it most definitely revolves around a young coach with a reputation as a recruiter.
We currently have a young coach with a reputation as a recruiter, and he hasn't done any better than the Old Coach with a reputation as an X's and O's guy.
That guy was far better than the coach who came in with a reputation as a recruiter (Hewitt), and that guy was far worse than the old guy who came before him.
The portal is not a cure all, recruiting is not a cure-all, X's and O's are not a cure-all, none of it is. We need the best coach who has the best combination of all of the above that we can get. If that's a 95-year-old guy, fine. If that's a 25-year-old guy, fine. If that's a long time head coach, fine. If that's a former player who's now an assistant, fine.
We shouldn't be closing ourselves off to possibilities, because we've tried a bunch of models, and the only one that has ever worked for us is "be Jim Larranaga".
A really really really good first step would be for us to start taking basketball is seriously as we take our demands of the head coach. If we had anything to offer that any other team in the A10 didn't, that would be nice.
Until such time, and until Jim Larranaga walks through that door, we should stay open-minded, because we've tried the model that you're advocating for two out of our last three coaches, and the results have been "meh".