Hancock also had a close prior relationship with Kevin Keatts, who coached him at Hargrave. Keatts was the one who lobbied Pitino to take him.
Even then, he was stuck mostly in the role of spot-up shooter at Louisville until he went bananas at the Final Four and won MOP.
It was honestly pretty frustrating watching their games before that NCAA tournament because they hardly used Luke, where he orchestrated the offense and had the ball in his hands all the time at Mason.
You're right about that. I would watch on occasion to see how he was doing and would always end up frustrated . . . till that tournament run.
I guess my point was that it ended up being the right move for Hancock, despite the fact that he had to accept a smaller role at a P5 school. He was afforded opportunities both while playing and after that he would never have had here.
If Hancock stayed, he would be among our all time greats. He may have even done enough to buy Hewitt another year or two.
Hancock took a risk transferring up and it paid off for him. It absolutely sucked for Mason basketball.
Despite it not being a perfect parallel, I could see Kier choosing to take a similar risk. The opportunity cost of staying at Mason seems rather high.