CBI or CIT?

[Bricker]

According to that logic, why should we care for the poor. They pay very little in taxes, so why should they get a voice..

THAT MAKES NO SENSE IN THE CONTEXT OF A BASKETBALL DISCUSSION

 

[GMUgemini]

According to that logic, why should we care for the poor. They pay very little in taxes, so why should they get a voice..

I'm starting to question the admission standards of George Mason University after this post. Or maybe you are like others on here and not an alum of the school?

 

[GMUSig03]

Can you guys also please put DJ3 and Mason Lawyer on ignore so these threads can make sense to me again? (I don't see their posts unless it's quoted, makes it very confusing)

 

[Bricker]

Can you guys also please put DJ3 and Mason Lawyer on ignore so these threads can make sense to me again? (I don't see their posts unless it's quoted, makes it very confusing)

I dunno Mason Lawyer might sue me. Can't take that risk.

 

[dildosaurusRexxx]

According to that logic, why should we care for the poor. They pay very little in taxes, so why should they get a voice..

come on bro

 

[GMUSig03]

I dunno Mason Lawyer might sue me. Can't take that risk.

I'll defend you.

 

[FreeGunston12]

One last point I was thinking about in response to the "where are our standards" argument.

If we were seriously considering this season a failure and were unhappy with Coach Paulsen's results this season to the point of putting him on the hot seat, who in their right mind would want to replace him and coach here? The man was probably runner up for A-10 COY.

 

[Haxormax]

I had to go back a few pages to find out we made it into a tournament. You guys are all douche bags. take your dumb conversation somewhere else.

 

[Leesburg Chankenstank III]

Obviously I'm not articulate with my words. I think Mason is heading into the right direction.

Try thinking about it this way. Kids who have parents who expect straight As tend to study a tad harder then then the student who has parents who don't give a shit.

Yeah and those parents who have the resources to send their kids to good high schools and good colleges have a much higher rate of success. Thus what everyone is telling you:

Expectations must be accompanied by funds. The only expectations that matter are people who give significant money or who you are courting to give significant money.

I expect the redskins management to not to be run like a lemonade stand, but my expectations don't mean shit because my contribution to their bottom line is non-existent. Got it?

 

[mason lawyer]

I dunno Mason Lawyer might sue me. Can't take that risk.

Wise Decision my man!

 

[mason lawyer]

One last point I was thinking about in response to the "where are our standards" argument.

If we were seriously considering this season a failure and were unhappy with Coach Paulsen's results this season to the point of putting him on the hot seat, who in their right mind would want to replace him and coach here? The man was probably runner up for A-10 COY.

Mason better be dancing next year or he will be in the hot seat.

 

[dildosaurusRexxx]

Mason better be dancing next year or he will be in the hot seat.

Trolling is most effective when you don't repeat yourself over and over again. Stir the pot a bit my friend.

 

[Cedric Dempsey]

Mason better be dancing next year or he will be in the hot seat.

I have a bag of money that says you are clueless.

 

[mason lawyer]

I have a bag of money that says you are clueless.

I would love to take your big bag of cash. Like taking money from a baby.

 

[Jack Strop]

So... what did you all think of the experimental rule of resetting the team fouls at the 10-minute mark of each half?

The rule didn't really have an impact on the game, but I thought the transition was awkward. I guess I could get used to it.

 

[Mason2005]

So... what did you all think of the experimental rule of resetting the team fouls at the 10-minute mark of each half?

The rule didn't really have an impact on the game, but I thought the transition was awkward. I guess I could get used to it.

I think the biggest effect it has is taking away the one and one from the game.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

 

[Vurbel]

So... what did you all think of the experimental rule of resetting the team fouls at the 10-minute mark of each half?

The rule didn't really have an impact on the game, but I thought the transition was awkward. I guess I could get used to it.

Wasn't a big deal when one team plays like it's their Super Bowl and the other plays like it's a glorified pick up game in the field house, not that I blame them. If we won the tournament we get to yell "we're number 101! we're number 101!" In the words of Chris Farley, "laddie friggin dah!"

 

[Falco]

So... what did you all think of the experimental rule of resetting the team fouls at the 10-minute mark of each half?

The rule didn't really have an impact on the game, but I thought the transition was awkward. I guess I could get used to it.

Not related to the CBI Rules, but I don't know where else to talk about it.
I don't like the "freedom of movement" fouls. The guys can barely play defense without getting called for a foul.
The league tends to think this will improve scoring. But it has been my observation that the game has slowed down due to all the foul calls. Players will adapt, but more and more teams play freshman.

I also don't think we need more scoring, I like close games that come down to the wire. I might be alone but I rather watch a game that's 50-55 then 80-60.

When you make rule changes to improve an aspect of the game, generally the better team is able to distance themselves better.

** I also know the freedom of movement fouls actually help our team because we are a driving team. But I am just talking about general basketball.

 

[Vurbel]

Not related to the CBI Rules, but I don't know where else to talk about it.
I don't like the "freedom of movement" fouls. The guys can barely play defense without getting called for a foul.
The league tends to think this will improve scoring. But it has been my observation that the game has slowed down due to all the foul calls. Players will adapt, but more and more teams play freshman.

I also don't think we need more scoring, I like close games that come down to the wire. I might be alone but I rather watch a game that's 50-55 then 80-60.

When you make rule changes to improve an aspect of the game, generally the better team is able to distance themselves better.

** I also know the freedom of movement fouls actually help our team because we are a driving team. But I am just talking about general basketball.

It negatively impacts vcu. Anything that hurts them I'm all for.

 

[Patriot8]

Not related to the CBI Rules, but I don't know where else to talk about it.
I don't like the "freedom of movement" fouls. The guys can barely play defense without getting called for a foul.
The league tends to think this will improve scoring. But it has been my observation that the game has slowed down due to all the foul calls. Players will adapt, but more and more teams play freshman.

I also don't think we need more scoring, I like close games that come down to the wire. I might be alone but I rather watch a game that's 50-55 then 80-60.

When you make rule changes to improve an aspect of the game, generally the better team is able to distance themselves better.

** I also know the freedom of movement fouls actually help our team because we are a driving team. But I am just talking about general basketball.

What about a 75-70 game? I don't care how high the point total is, I think everyone would agree that a 5 point game is more exciting than a 20 point game... Unless Mason is playing... I want them winning everything by 20