If I had to guess it probably has less to do with the Koch’s donations and more to do with the Kavanaugh hire.
That I could understand - but that had nothing to do with money.
If I had to guess it probably has less to do with the Koch’s donations and more to do with the Kavanaugh hire.
That I could understand - but that had nothing to do with money.
My guess it has more to do with accepting the donation to rename the Law School despite some protestations. The president doesn’t really dip his toe on faculty decisions, even high profile ones.
Overall, not really sure why everyone is saying good riddance. I think overall Cabrera has done a good job pushing Mason forward. If he didn’t, a top tier university like Georgia Tech wouldn’t have come calling. I thank you for your service to Mason and wish you luck.
Totally concur. Cabrera did a great job and the University is better than when he took the office. I wish him well and hope he still visits in the future.
My guess is that Cabrera never really seemed to have the public presence that Merten did. I’ve only heard each speak a couple of times. When I think of comparing the two, I think distinctly of Merten at my convocation vs Cabrera at my commencement. Merten seemed to have a much better relationship with the students. He also had the benefit of presiding during the “golden age” of Mason basketball. Regardless, he seemed much more genuine in his enthusiasm for Mason and seemed to be more of a “relationships” person. Cabrera, in contrast, was sold to us as a businessman.My guess it has more to do with accepting the donation to rename the Law School despite some protestations. The president doesn’t really dip his toe on faculty decisions, even high profile ones.
Overall, not really sure why everyone is saying good riddance. I think overall Cabrera has done a good job pushing Mason forward. If he didn’t, a top tier university like Georgia Tech wouldn’t have come calling. I thank you for your service to Mason and wish you luck.
My guess is that Cabrera never really seemed to have the public presence that Merten did. I’ve only heard each speak a couple of times. When I think of comparing the two, I think distinctly of Merten at my convocation vs Cabrera at my commencement. Merten seemed to have a much better relationship with the students. He also had the benefit of presiding during the “golden age” of Mason basketball. Regardless, he seemed much more genuine in his enthusiasm for Mason and seemed to be more of a “relationships” person. Cabrera, in contrast, was sold to us as a businessman.
Cabrera may have done a lot for the school, but most will judge a person based on how they made them feel. And most of us only had indirect contact with him by watching him at basketball games, commencements, etc. It is probably unfair and unwise to judge Cabrera that way, but that’s just why I think some are fine seeing him go.
Well, that’s kinda my point. I’m sure he was a very good president from every measurable, quantifiable business perspective.I think a top ten public research university and ACC member has their priorities straight and vetting procedures detailed. Most P5 presidents don’t even show up for basketball games. He appeared to be their only target. Good for him. He’ll evolve quickly.
The guy brought a very europeans mindset to Mason. Very much focused on the numbers and increasing enrollment. Not sure he ever really quite cared about the social aspects/alumni engagement aspects of the American collegiate experience.My guess is that Cabrera never really seemed to have the public presence that Merten did. I’ve only heard each speak a couple of times. When I think of comparing the two, I think distinctly of Merten at my convocation vs Cabrera at my commencement. Merten seemed to have a much better relationship with the students. He also had the benefit of presiding during the “golden age” of Mason basketball. Regardless, he seemed much more genuine in his enthusiasm for Mason and seemed to be more of a “relationships” person. Cabrera, in contrast, was sold to us as a businessman.
Cabrera may have done a lot for the school, but most will judge a person based on how they made them feel. And most of us only had indirect contact with him by watching him at basketball games, commencements, etc. It is probably unfair and unwise to judge Cabrera that way, but that’s just why I think some are fine seeing him go.
Well, that’s kinda my point. I’m sure he was a very good president from every measurable, quantifiable business perspective.
I just hope whomever replaces Cabrera at Mason will work to become beloved by the students, staff, and alumni. Invest in those relationships (which I’m sure Cabrera did, this is not a shot at him), and the business side of things will work itself out.
P.S. - your statement about Georgia Tech’s priorities and vetting is laughable considering why there is an opening for Cabrera to take in the first place.
To give them the benefit of the doubt because they are a “top ten public research university and ACC member” is bull crap. Hence the ethical issues ongoing. To say they should be more careful on the next hire is obvious. But you can’t say, based on current events, that they have their “priorities straight”. They are going to have to work to earn that endorsement. You’re wrong to just give them that back automatically.You’re right. Bad things never happen in high performing organizations. If they actually did you certainly would not be more aware and extra cautious on the next hire. Hiring a proven leader with a strong ethics reputation to recover should never happen.
Yup. It just happens automatically. It doesn’t take time and effort to invest in relationships with people. All educational leaders are just loved. There is no such thing as a “people person”. Admiration is a construct of the proletariat.You cant work to "become beloved". It should just happen.
Yup. It just happens automatically. It doesn’t take time and effort to invest in relationships with people. All educational leaders are just loved. There is no such thing as a “people person”. Admiration is a construct of the proletariat.
To give them the benefit of the doubt because they are a “top ten public research university and ACC member” is bull crap. Hence the ethical issues ongoing. To say they should be more careful on the next hire is obvious. But you can’t say, based on current events, that they have their “priorities straight”. They are going to have to work to earn that endorsement. You’re wrong to just give them that back automatically.
Fine, then don’t tell us you’re sure “a top 10 public research university and ACC member has their priorities straight and vetting procedures detailed”. What you’re sure of is that you like Cabrera. And good luck to him. I’m sure he’ll do well at GT.I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt because they hired Angel and I am saying their priorities are straight by doing so. Shit happens in any organization. Ask about ten elite institutions affected by Varsity Blues. Everybody gets smarter.
If we got another Cabrera, I'd be happy.Fine, then don’t tell us you’re sure “a top 10 public research university and ACC member has their priorities straight and vetting procedures detailed”. What you’re sure of is that you like Cabrera. And good luck to him. I’m sure he’ll do well at GT.
Honest question: what do you want out of the next president of Mason? What would you look for in a replacement?
Fine, then don’t tell us you’re sure “a top 10 public research university and ACC member has their priorities straight and vetting procedures detailed”. What you’re sure of is that you like Cabrera. And good luck to him. I’m sure he’ll do well at GT.
Honest question: what do you want out of the next president of Mason? What would you look for in a replacement?
No need. We’re all team Mason here. Sorry if I came at you a little bit there. Educational leadership may be a bit of a passionate topic for me. As is anything Mason related.I don’t know Cabrera at all but I like what he has done. Next Prez needs to be next level thinker in higher ed and government both state and federal. Now you can skewer me.