vcu's investment in program infrastructure and ability to maintain continuity from one coach to the next has been a much greater factor in its success than the HAVOC brand.
They have been consistently successful enough that quality players and coaches want to be there. When one leaves another takes his place. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I'd argue that it's both, in equal balance, and one has depended on the othervcu's investment in program infrastructure and ability to maintain continuity from one coach to the next has been a much greater factor in its success than the HAVOC brand.
They have been consistently successful enough that quality players and coaches want to be there. When one leaves another takes his place. Wash, rinse, repeat.
As pointed out.....BRANDING was and is our failure. (And for many schools who see athletics as a side door to the University!)
And branding also includes program infrastructure, continuity, etc. EVERYTHING is done with a the BRAND in mind. It's not just HAVOC its the program. Though a little bit different...vcu has been branding their basketball program since Capel: aggressive, young, ethnic....long before Shaka.
You don't walk into a sh*tty Mercedes dealership complete with crappy desks and service technicians in cut off wrangler shorts. The Mercedes salesman wear suits, stay at dealerships longer and are a cut above your Dodge salesman.
I'd argue that it's both, in equal balance, and one has depended on the other
We were winning consistently in the exact same time frame. And I truly believe that better branding would have made a difference in continuing that winning. Maybe more donor and ticket support means practice facility and higher assistant salary - keeping L and Hancock - and continuing the success.They already had started winning consistently under Capel and Grant before Shaka came in and started the Havoc stuff.
Hire good coaches and win games and that becomes your brand.
We were winning consistently in the exact same time frame. And I truly believe that better branding would have made a difference in continuing that winning. Maybe more donor and ticket support means practice facility and higher assistant salary - keeping L and Hancock - and continuing the success.
You say it's coaching, I say it's coachingand recruiting, both of which were helped by branding - vcu being a more attractive job than Mason.
And branding made them nationally prominent which is why they have made a couple of NCAAT in that 8 year run they didn't really deserve. You make many good points but then insult people's basketball knowledge if they disagree. I don't dispute your basketball knowledge but if you think vcu's brand has made no difference to the selection committee, I do question one aspect of your knowledge. You know the X's and Os of this sport much better than I do, but I am slightly questioning whether you know the business as well as I thought.
We're really not disagreeing, and I did say in my original post that being nationally relevant would negate the branding argument. You, though, are digging in and refusing to accept the possibility that branding had something to do with that success.
Sadly, no. No one knows what we know about the gimmick that is havoc. It I think that's my point. They have "branded" (sorry, dead horse, but I don't know another word) themselves out of that mattering. So they can continue to fool the committee, recruits, and coaching candidates.I don't mean to be disagreeable. I thought I admitted they have kicked our asses in the branding department. No argument whatsoever.
I just think all the branding in the world means little unless you back it up by winning consistently.
vcu has made seven consecutive NCAAs. Do you think anyone realizes they've been to the same number of Sweet 16s as Mason?
I for one love the disagreement. Take a look at vcu's boards. It's the biggest circle jerk of all time. You could tell them their new coach was Hewitt, that they're gonna have to play next season in the dining hall, and that Trump is gonna be their new assistant AD for communications and they would tell you you're an idiot for thinking they won't run the table. Most of them actually believe their entire recruiting class is staying put.Sadly, no. No one knows what we know about the gimmick that is havoc. It I think that's my point. They have "branded" (sorry, dead horse, but I don't know another word) themselves out of that mattering. So they can continue to fool the committee, recruits, and coaching candidates.
We're talking in circles because we agree more than disagree and we're having an unprovable chicken and egg argument.
It's not that you're disagreeable; that's what we're here for! But sometimes I think you are a little insulting - which is cool if that's your online thing. I think 99% of the time it's frustration with idiots and trolls and sometimes it gets directed at the wrong people. For the record, I didn't feel you did that to me, but within this thread there's examples you can find.
No worries; I'm certainly not the board police and this would be a much worse place without your posts. Just tipsyly pointing out something I've noticed.
Havoc is not their brand anymore bc Wade pushed it aside. Their brand is three letters. vcu. They win more, make more, and have more butts in the seats bc they saw how not to manage a post Final Four run.
There is nobody here to blame other than Merten and TOC. By not reinvesti g in the Old Cuban, they cost Mason millions. May they both burn in hell.
Fair point. But I will take my hatred of TOC to my deathbed.The good news is they are both gone and we have new leadership that will leverage success more effectively.
Stop looking backwards and look forwards.
We are starting to sound like chicks with sand in the vagina syndrome.
True, however i'd imagine that EagleBank wouldn't be spending that much money if it was called "EagleBank Arena at the Patriot Center".I didn't want to create a new thread but we are pulling in more money for our 10-year naming rights deal with Eagle Bank vs. vcu.
We signed a 10-year $6.6 million pact with Eagle Bank (just finished year 2). We have another 10-year option worth $6.6 million with them once this current 10-year pact expires.
vcu on the other hand signed a 10-year, $2.75 million pact with the Wade family for the Seigel Center
http://vcuathletics.com/general/2016-17/releases/20160929k2nufs
I never doubted the wisdom of moving to the A 10. I only doubted the wisdom of hiring the Virus in the first place. We would not have fallen so far had we been more patient with our hire after Coach L left.