I doubt it. Maybe for a underperforming season you could argue that and the switch to a tougher conference, but getting curb-stomped by Duquesne on Senior Night and swept by Fordham are eye-openers.
For financial reasons, we may have to suffer through another season of Paul Ball. Maybe not a bad thing in the long run if it frees up budget for the next coach - but have to balance that out w/the damage to the Mason brand in the meantime.
As GS has pointed out, the money issue is basically just a smokescreen.
In order to give a coach a contract with the incentives Hewitt has, you have to budget for even the remote possibility that he reaches all of them -- otherwise, if he does, you're in a hole.
Plus, unless he resigns, we're going to have to pay Hewitt (and most likely, his assistants) for the next 2 years whether they coach or not.
So the real cost of firing them is what it would cost us to hire a new staff.
IF the president was smart and would hire a young coach on the rise instead of a retread on the way down the coaching ladder, we could easily land a whole new staff for $800,000.
If that amount of money is a deal-breaker, we should not be in the A-10 because we will never have the resources to compete with the other top programs.