Here's my $.02 (and obviously, as Jollay pointed out, my views are colored by living in the shadows of the Siegel Center): I see no reason whatsoever that Mason can't be on equal footing in men's basketball with vcu, if only the commitment from the university was there to do so.
If somebody can explain to me the specific factors that make it impossible for us to do so, then I'll shut up and never bring this up again.
I'm not asking to be Duke or Kentucky. But if we can't (or won't) even raise and spend enough money on men's hoops to compete on even terms with another non-football state school like vcu, then I'm not sure why any of us invest any time, energy or money into the program.
Maybe I'm alone in this regard, but I would be far more inclined to open my wallet and donate if the AD and President would outline specific basketball-related projects (capital improvements, salary increases, etc.) that need X amount of funding to become reality.
I'd also be more motivated to give if we didn't insist on offering a bunch of sports that never win, don't have adequate funding and do nothing but suck resources away from teams that the general public could actually care about.
I just don't have much confidence that Mason is ever going to go "all in" on basketball. Our leadership has never seemed to really grasp the direct benefit to the university from big-time athletic success. For some reason, they seem perfectly OK with doing things in a half-a** manner.
vcu's president and AD get it, and they're taking concrete steps to make their program a consistent contender on the national stage. I'd imagine it's a lot easier to solicit donors when that's your message and you back it up with action.