Hahaha.... yes. HystericalYou mean something like this:
View attachment 2262
Hahaha.... yes. HystericalYou mean something like this:
View attachment 2262
Look how f**king stupid this looks. It looks like a damn Microsoft Outlook signature with the Name, Position Title and Company.
Brand guidelines haven’t made their way to the baseball team yet.Look how f**king stupid this looks. It looks like a damn Microsoft Outlook signature with the Name, Position Title and Company.
Best X comment I've seen so far.
Yes, but that’s not the plan forever. It’s something about athletics not being able to use the logo without the words. It’s kinda confusing.I mean, is the plan to have it be tiny and just pair it with the George Mason all the time? As an explanation?
I may just steal the logo and put it on a polo over General Mills. Cereal.
Huh?Yes, but that’s not the plan forever. It’s something about athletics not being able to use the logo without the words. It’s kinda confusing.
I see that or even a Ram ☹️I see a baby crawling. Now I can’t unsee it
Look how f**king stupid this looks. It looks like a damn Microsoft Outlook signature with the Name, Position Title and Company.
Did we win the game?
We may never win another game.Nope. Lost 4-6. So far 0-1 with the poop logo.
what would be revolutionary, if not a bit (very) sell out, would be the quill logo with the adidas three stripes instead
Ditto. Just for the record, I went through all my emails from Mason and could not find any evidence I had been informed of some opportunity to provide feedback or attend a viewing.You generally know that I am a caring a fan, as I know you are as well.. I can count on one hand the number of home games I failed to attend. If there was on opportunity to participate in the development of the new logo then I was never apprised by Mason admin. It's all spilled milk now, though.
Any discussion of the quill logo?I participated in a zoom meeting with a few others on here back in January. While we never saw any possible new logos, I recall a lot of the discussion was around the old logo and how/why it didn't really connect with a lot of us. I do remember discussion about how having a school logo and an athletics logo that intertwined would be nice instead of two that were totally unrelated. At one point there was some talk about the old GM logo and how people liked it/prefered it over the star logo. Really, the gist of it was nobody had a connection with the star logo.
I don't recall any, other than the mention that you go into our bookstore and you would see two vastly different logos on the products.Any discussion of the quill logo?
I always thought it was pretty normal to have an academic logo and an athletic's logo. I just did a quick look at the first 3 schools in the league I could think of (UD, vcu and SLU) and all three of them appear to have both.I don't recall any, other than the mention that you go into our bookstore and you would see two vastly different logos on the products.