Its like this....
Hewitt - Runs more a "develop the individual player mentality and getting kids to the next level and promises those kids the world." He stresses uptempo offense and running and gunning people out of the gym. Would rather have a 4 star 6-8 freak of an athlete wing player who can "do it all" on the court. The less coaching Hewitt has to do on player's fundamentals the best for him and his assistants. Wants to run his 4-1 offense and create points from running this uptempo offense.
Paulsen - I see is more in the Coach L mindset and style. Team comes first. Everyone works together to achieve great results for the team. Not about individual flair, or bragging rights, he wants to get the best out of the 5 players on the court rather than the individual. He would rather have 5 guys being consistent in games rather than having one stud scoring 25 points a game. He would rather have a 2 star athlete who hustles his butt off, plays defense, puts team first, and sees steady improvement throughout his college career. Wants to play defense, defense, defense and run more of a traditional, structured offense.
Since 1998, we have seen the "Paulsen" type take our BBall program to new heights and set a standard of basketball we have grown to appreciate and also demand.
In 4 years we have seen the "Hewitt" type take our winning, promising team and throw it down the toilets to levels most of us have not seen in a very long time. I'm lucky and have only witnessed our program, since 1999, produce winners and winning teams/seasons. These losing years, since this type of "Hewitt" bball that has been employed, has shown his strategy has not worked for the past few years. I think being in the A-10 and not having regular access to 4-5 type star bball players hampers our ability to be able to run Hewitt's type of offense and defense. Hewitt landing 2-3 stars for us and him not coaching them up, or refusing to switch strategies, doomed us. He accomplished success at GT for a while because of being in the ACC and GT being relatively good in bball and having the ability to recruit 4-5 star players definitely helps when running his style of play. Nothing wrong with running his offense, or defense, but not at a Mid-Major school where our luster of being in the national spotlight has rubbed off and makes us hard to recruit top talent coming off losing seasons.
What really sucks is these kids.... Porter, Lockett, Mayimba, and Jackson bought in to this washed up fraud of a basketball coach with his personal sales pitch of I will get you ready for the next level bullcrap, is that they have never seen a college coach like a Paulsen, or Larranaga, who stresses TEAM basketball, hard work, outworking your opponent, stressing fundamentals, and running plays as a unit and playing team defense. Paulsen's type is good for business.... he will get us where we need to be in time and I welcome every kid who wants to put the team first and play sound, fundamental basketball rather than kids who just want their time to shine.
If Lockett, Porter, Jackson are these types of kids then I feel sorry for them. If they seriously are all about themselves and are looking for a place where they can be ballhogs or coaches promising them the world then best of luck to you. But if they seriously have no idea and don't know any better of the great team spectacles to come with Coach Paulsen then shame on us for not having the ability to get these themes across to them and how to be good teammates, and people in general. I hope it is the first statement rather than the latter.
Paulsen will be good, I'm glad the rest of the roster are ready to rock. Holloway, Jenkins, and Thompson will definitely improve under a team environment with sound, structured basketball.