Good point about the versitility of Boyd. I just think the threat of Boyd’s three opens up the paint. Which is why I prefer him over Mar. But you’re right it’s nice to sub him in for the 2-4I don't know, if you start Boyd, a, you make us supremely undersized and, b, you have no one on that second line you can count on to get points. Your bench would become Mar (3.6ppg), Calixte (3.9 ppg), Hartwell (1.7 ppg), and AJ Wilson (4.4 ppg).
Plus, Boyd's first sub-in can come at the 2, 3, or 4 spot whereas you can't do the same for Mar.
When Boyd comes in and scores and shoots from 3, it gives the team an awesome energy. It is still the best fit for a guy like him who can come in, defend well, get a key rebound or hit a three.
I would prefer the best players start - why not get that awesome energy from the start of the game instead of waiting?
I would be happy to see Calixte and Boyd starting in place of Reuter/Mar.
Not only Mar and Reuter but shouldnt Otis be included too? Its debatable if he should play 34 mins and have only 6pts. Does Hartwell come in? Does Kier move to Pg in certain game situations? I don't know answer but I feel like a few things could help us win more.
The other small mistake was having Calixte in late who cannot make ft's. Left possible 4pts on the floor.
Finally, is it too much to get AJ to also do what Kier did vs the zone? Attack middle soft spot with jumpers and/or drives to basket? Aj is only big closest to being complete.