Maddox is shooting 29% from 3, way down from last season.
Anderson is invisible on offense more often than not.
Have to think Maddox figures it out, but those are two guys we thought we could count on for consistent 3pt scoring. Are they not getting the ball in good positions to shoot? Not being aggressive enough?
Or run some plays to get Anderson or Maddox open. Sans today, both need help shooting better and maybe some plays to free them up would be helpful.
Or run some plays to get Anderson or Maddox open. Both need help shooting better and maybe some plays to free them up would be helpful.
There’s an idea! Maddox has to force a lot, teams know to leave Billups wide open. Love the kid but he’s not a shooter.
This all goes back to having a pg though. How do you run plays? Run back door cuts for woody ?
This is all overreaction. Only losses by more than a bucket are Duke and Marquette. I’m sure we score pretty low on the “luck” metric.
Haynes and Maddox had a combined 9 points in the first half. It’s not like they were carrying the team on their backs to build that lead. What I’m seeing is that other guys like Newton, O’Connor, Billups are starting to step up. The movement was much better in the first half, but the ball stuck in Haynes and Maddox’s hands too much in the second half.
We were just coming off our best game of the season. More of Davidson and the first half against Rhode Island moving forward and we will be just fine.
This is all overreaction. Only losses by more than a bucket are Duke and Marquette. I’m sure we score pretty low on the “luck” metric.
Haynes and Maddox had a combined 9 points in the first half. It’s not like they were carrying the team on their backs to build that lead. What I’m seeing is that other guys like Newton, O’Connor, Billups are starting to step up. The movement was much better in the first half, but the ball stuck in Haynes and Maddox’s hands too much in the second half.
We were just coming off our best game of the season. More of Davidson and the first half against Rhode Island moving forward and we will be just fine.
Except it’s not overreaction it’s literally fact. They are not only bad at foul shots they are an epic joke! Their pg’s turn the ball over way too much. Those aren’t debatable. So Maddox and Haynes didn’t score? Say it ain’t so it’s almost like you’re arguing for me… they score we win. They don’t we lose!
They have a major turnover problem, fact. I’ll never understand people who argue facts. Can look them up. They only have 1 road win over a ‘bad JMU’ team which I guess is debatable but that’s only part that’s debatable. Can they shoot better on the line? Sure but haven’t seen it.
So again either they start shooting better, find a pg who can hold onto the damn ball or find a way to win games in a way that literally goes against every logic.
Your top 2 scorers, (stats for that) don’t score it’s hard to win. If you are going to argue they have a pg just save it.
Can they go 17-1 sure but not turning ball over not shooting 50% on line and going 2-17 from 3. So it’s not an overreaction, they played like shit and that won’t cut it. Period the end, either figure out how to be better or they won’t win on road.
Also already said if they beat that stupid clown faced loser hipster team it’s a successful season. If they had last years schedule I would 100% say top 4 is possible but they probably have one of worst schedules in A10 but I suppose that’s an overreaction too?
I’ll never understand the debate in sports on what’s fact and not fact. I mean they ‘COULD’ win the national championship but it would defy all normal logic so I would say that’s an overreaction. Making assumptions that go against the numbers are normally overreactions but whatever.
Point blank, fix the turnovers learn how to make a damn foul shot and win games. Don’t they lose. End of story, have a good one.