Game 12: Naval Academy, Friday, December 21st, 7 PM, ESPN+

Five Two

All-American
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
I saw the team got to spend some time with the Globetrotters this week. Lets hope they don't try any of that stuff against Navy. We turn the ball over enough trying to do the basics, we don't need Otis trying to be Medowlark Lemon
 

masonjoe

Starter
I saw the team got to spend some time with the Globetrotters this week. Lets hope they don't try any of that stuff against Navy. We turn the ball over enough trying to do the basics, we don't need Otis trying to be Medowlark Lemon

Wish they worked on defense instead...
 

MasonFanatic

Moderator
Staff member
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GIVING DAY 2023
I think we're starting to forget how good Grayer was last season before he got hurt.

I hope we see that guy again soon. I can't imaging having the same injury 2 seasons in a row. Especially for a guy who probably wants to play professionally when he's done at Mason.
 

GMUSig03

All-Conference
Wear your ugly holiday sweater on Friday for a "chance to win big" per email. The Shannons will be showing their spirit!

Oh, and let's beat Navy by fitty
 

Pikapppatri8

Hall of Famer
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
So a sweater depicting a menorah would not qualify? Christians already appropriated enough from other religions/organizations - I stand by HOLIDAY SWEATER (LARGER FONT MEANS I'M RIGHT).

Nope wrong assumption - that would be an Ugly Chanukah sweater and there is a precedent for that as depicted on SNL multiple times.

You could also have an ugly Festivis sweater.

My argument is against the generalization we are forced to use by PC Nazis because any mention of anything specific - particularly related to religion is deemed “offensive “.

As if someone saying “Merry Christmas” or Happy Chanukah” or “Glorious Festivus” to someone who may not be a practicing member of those religions is essentially saying “Go f**k Yourself”.

Which is a ridiculous assumption.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

GMUSig03

All-Conference
Nope wrong assumption - that would be an Ugly Chanukah sweater and there is a precedent for that as depicted on SNL multiple times.

You could also have an ugly Festivis sweater.

My argument is against the generalization we are forced to use by PC Nazis because any mention of anything specific - particularly related to religion is deemed “offensive “.

As if someone saying “Merry Christmas” or Happy Chanukah” or “Glorious Festivus” to someone who may not be a practicing member of those religions is essentially saying “Go f*ck Yourself”.

Which is a ridiculous assumption.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Started typing response... but pointless. Everything you said is a complete non-sequitur. Moving on...
 

mkaufman1

Administrator
Staff member
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GIVING DAY 2023
1*qJ3ghT5yaCoaex921AsLuA.png
 

Pikapppatri8

Hall of Famer
⭐️ Donor ⭐️
GOLD SPONSOR
So a sweater depicting a menorah would not qualify? Christians already appropriated enough from other religions/organizations - I stand by HOLIDAY SWEATER (LARGER FONT MEANS I'M RIGHT).

Now one question - I am interested to see which holidays Christians have appropriated from other religions or organizations. That was a curious statement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top