I know I'm singularly alone in this, but honestly, I don't care. I'm right, and you're all wrong.
Paulsen didn't fail. He took us from a bottom of the barrel A10 team and stabilized us in the conference. There's no doubt we belong in the conference now, and we're a solid middle of the pack team.
We paid middle of the road money for Paulsen, and provided middle of the road resources.
To me, that's not "failing", it's delivering about what you'd expect.
To me, firing him means that we are looking for better, and that's fine, but if we're not willing to put better resources into the next hire, then we're setting him up to "fail".
I know a lot of people here are apparently fine with just rolling the dice over and over again until we happen to roll 11.
The whole "dave paulsen was a lower level coach and that doesn't work" is pretty lame logic, considering so was Larranaga.
To me, I'd VASTLY prefer Kelsey to English, but IF WE ARE GOING to go down the "roll the dice" road, English seems like the safest/best pick.