Kolek might never been a point guard considering he could barely dribble here. Have to give some credit to Shaka Smart.If Kolek and Miller had stayed, who are the starting five? I believe it's:
Starters:
Kolek
Bailey
Ticket
Miller
Oduro
Bench:
Polite
Cooper
Ojiako
Henry
Fernandez
Three starters and two key reserves are DP recruits.
Interesting question.Someone who hasn’t seen much of our program in person was with me today and made the comment that there was too much coaching going on during the game, to the point it seemed like the team was in their heads too much.
Had not thought about this, as I thought it’s been a good change. But is there something too it? JF finally got run and didn’t get yanked as soon as he made a mistake and had a solid game. Have guys been looking over their shoulders too much? Is KE projecting a micromanager style in game?
Someone who hasn’t seen much of our program in person was with me today and made the comment that there was too much coaching going on during the game, to the point it seemed like the team was in their heads too much.
Had not thought about this, as I thought it’s been a good change. But is there something too it? JF finally got run and didn’t get yanked as soon as he made a mistake and had a solid game. Have guys been looking over their shoulders too much? Is KE projecting a micromanager style in game?
North Texas coach will end up at Texas I hope. Gates is about to go from 3 losses to 10 very soon so I’m not too worried. CKE couldn’t get a job at Joes Crab Shack yet much less an SEC schoolSaw that Dennis Gates might be linked to the Texas job which would open up Missouri again. I agree with the above that CKE isn’t quite there yet, but I suspect he will be rumored every year.
Although at this juncture Texas most likely will stick with their assistant who is highly regarded.
Feeling stupid here...I thought I knew what these graphs were saying, but now I don't. I thought they were a graph of the score over time from left to right with the centerline being tied and the further away you go from there indicates a lead.View attachment 1613View attachment 1614View attachment 1615View attachment 1616View attachment 1617View attachment 1618
We have a spectacular ability to blow solid leads in conference roadies in the KE era. This is his biggest thing to figure out. IDGAF about free throws, we missed all of them before we took an 8 point lead with two minutes left. I believe in gravity - losing teams find ways to lose. Need a breakthrough in the worst way, I really thought Kimmie coached his tits off for the first 38 minutes.
If I am reading CKE and the other coaches correctly during the games it is maddening to them as well. They are repeatedly encouraging the guys to pick up the pace getting the ball down the court when they do this slow paced play.I probably won't have time to dive through specific possessions but we absolutely SUCK at trying to take the air out of the ball. We naturally move slow already! Any possession that starts with a Josh post-up isn't getting a shot up with more than 8 seconds left on the shot clock anyway. When Ronnie dribble dribble dribbles and we don't get into our action until 12s we NEVER score. It's always an awful possession with an awful shot or sometimes a shot clock violation. Maddening.
The graph represents a team's probability of winning, not the point differential. Hence by the end of the game, the graph always is at the very top (100% chance that the visitors won) or very bottom (100% that the home team won). When it's 50%, the line is in the middle of the graph.Feeling stupid here...I thought I knew what these graphs were saying, but now I don't. I thought they were a graph of the score over time from left to right with the centerline being tied and the further away you go from there indicates a lead.
What has me confused is the SLU game. They beat us by one, but if my understanding is correct, the graph seems to say they beat us by 10 or more points based on the other peaks.
Can you help me understand them?
Ahh that makes sense. Thanks! I don't think it is as useful to make Petey's point that we blow leads at the end as graphing the score would, but still points that way.The graph represents a team's probability of winning, not the point differential. Hence by the end of the game, the graph always is at the very top (100% chance that the visitors won) or very bottom (100% that the home team won). When it's 50%, the line is in the middle of the graph.
I think the line plunging vertically at the end of the graph tells the story pretty well. In all those games Mason’s win probability was high until the very end. It’s just gross how many times that has happened in a season and a half.Ahh that makes sense. Thanks! I don't think it is as useful to make Petey's point that we blow leads at the end as graphing the score would, but still points that way.
It does, but, to me, it is an exaggeration since it will always plunge for a loss (or spike up if we win).I think the line plunging vertically at the end of the graph tells the story pretty well. In all those games Mason’s win probability was high until the very end. It’s just gross how many times that has happened in a season and a half.
I’m not a math guy by any stretch, but I think it only changes sharply like that when a big lead goes away in a short period of time, aka The Mason Special (trademarked)It does, but, to me, it is an exaggeration since it will always plunge for a loss (or spike up if we win).