Loyalty is a tough thing to define. Even tougher is the line between being loyal and just being irrational. I guess the thing that bothers me the most is the thought that the leadership (see TOC) would put his ego above the well being of the program. Do I know this is the case? No, I don't, but I think it's the real reason a lot of people are threatening with certain actions.
It's clearly not the losing. It's the notion that the program is a sinking ship, but that the captain would rather be proven to be wrong than actually save the ship. I also see both sides of the argument, but I do not see the side that questions anyone's loyalty. You're on a freakin message board for a mid-major team that hasn't won a conference game this year. You're clearly not a bandwagon fan. What makes people more bitter and tend to threaten more is the fact that because we're not a high profile program, media scrutiny is basically none. There are no outside forces pushing change so people feel as though the only way to effectuate change is through more personal means.
It's clearly not the losing. It's the notion that the program is a sinking ship, but that the captain would rather be proven to be wrong than actually save the ship. I also see both sides of the argument, but I do not see the side that questions anyone's loyalty. You're on a freakin message board for a mid-major team that hasn't won a conference game this year. You're clearly not a bandwagon fan. What makes people more bitter and tend to threaten more is the fact that because we're not a high profile program, media scrutiny is basically none. There are no outside forces pushing change so people feel as though the only way to effectuate change is through more personal means.