some folks just shouldn't be allowed to have Twitter.She's currently trolling anyone on Twitter and FB who post anything negative about Mason ball lol. Does she work for Mason? Is she a big donor?
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
some folks just shouldn't be allowed to have Twitter.She's currently trolling anyone on Twitter and FB who post anything negative about Mason ball lol. Does she work for Mason? Is she a big donor?
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Jack-Better get in touch with the dean of the Law school. With all this earmarked money, there are going to be hookers everywhere!All of that money is earmarked for specific purposes by donors. They didn't just raise a random 680 mil to do what they want with.
She's currently trolling anyone on Twitter and FB who post anything negative about Mason ball lol. Does she work for Mason? Is she a big donor?
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Jack-Better get in touch with the dean of the Law school. With all this earmarked money, there are going to be hookers everywhere!
She’s not a big donor (Gold room level though) but she’s become notorious among the fanbase for not letting anyone be subjective and having an opinion. She calls anyone who’s negative a troll and constantly posts green and gold hearts. Anyone who interacts on twitter (mason twitter as I call it) knows she’s a piece of work and mostly choose to ignore her and continue interacting with one another.
It’s really a shame she feels the need to attack everyone constantly. I’m surprised she hasn’t come on here and started with everyone yet.
Can’t let little details get in the way of a meme, now, can we?To be fair, the earmarked money was directed by the department and not by the donors (although during giving day, we did had dollar for dollar matching for some of the priorities — same thing this year).
Was it ever really an actual plan or just me posting about it since this board was formed in the late 90s?Maybe we need to dust off that eliminate sports plan again and save some money that way?
Some weird woman who has no concept of how twitter should be used. I’ve also overheard her at least twice in the Gold Room brag about how she was texting Otis.Who is Laura Libby May?
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Was it ever really an actual plan or just me posting about it since this board was formed in the late 90s?
She's currently trolling anyone on Twitter and FB who post anything negative about Mason ball lol.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
She’s not a big donor (Gold room level though) but she’s become notorious among the fanbase for not letting anyone be subjective and having an opinion. She calls anyone who’s negative a troll and constantly posts green and gold hearts.
It’s really a shame she feels the need to attack everyone constantly. I’m surprised she hasn’t come on here and started with everyone yet.
Some weird woman who has no concept of how twitter should be used. I’ve also overheard her at least twice in the Gold Room brag about how she was texting Otis.
Her facebook page has nothing but Otis on it. Almost as if there is nothing else in her life whatsoever.
I would seriously caution Otis as she does not seem to be an emotionally/mentally healthy person. What starts out as a seemingly innocent infatuaton can lead Kathy Bates level "Misery"
View attachment 734
I was thinking she has a homemade shrine of Otis in her closet like Helga from Hey Arnold but this works too.Her facebook page has nothing but Otis on it. Almost as if there is nothing else in her life whatsoever.
I would seriously caution Otis as she does not seem to be an emotionally/mentally healthy person. What starts out as a seemingly innocent infatuaton can lead to Kathy Bates level "Misery"
View attachment 734
What, exactly, makes her any different than most of the "homers" on this site?
I still don’t see a differenceWhile you may think there are homers on here to whatever degree, she’s extremely different in that she doesn’t look to have any conversation and immediately looks to just call people trolls for being negative or whenever she disagrees.
We are all homers to an extent if we are fans of a program or a team, but when all you do is want to be positive, with no discussion or points to back it, and want to attack folks in the fanbase, it’s way different. It’s the same as always being negative and not giving props when something goes well. Neither is good imo.
It’s fine to be positive, but when there’s a bad loss it’s a bad loss. Don’t just attack people. And that’s what the underlying point with her and this discussion is about.
I still don’t see a difference