The point isn't what's said it's how it's said and when (since we had posts in threads completely unrelated to men's basketball or even Mason athletics at all complaining about the men's basketball team and Hewitt) like the baseball thread "well that's nice bit our basketball team sucks!"
I think the golden rule of criticism is if you don't want to provide solid evidence or want to answer the question "why" for your opinion stay silent.
It's like the complaint about the scoreboard. Why don't we have a video scoreboard? Is it because TOC is the worst AD in the history of the NCAA who has no clue or is it more complicated than that?
I just told you, at this point it has deteriorated to that kinda stuff happening and being said. If you want well thought out criticisms and still a tinge of hopefullness posts, go back to years 1 and 2. At this point, you arent going to get that because its A)visible every single game, B)everybody knows what the problems are, C) its all been said before, D) There is no real light at the end of the tunnel at the moment.
For your "golden rule" the answer why, it can simply be found by tuning in for 10 minutes of one of our games. Yeah, thats where we are at currently. Every shred of criticism that has been posted here, can be found game in and game out.
As for the scoreboard, most reasonable people would understand (like I said in my last post) its not as simple as "get money install/build ____". But at the same time, after years start to go by, we continually get the same story. Yes the roof needs reinforced were told (makes sense)......but what is being done to start that process? How close are we to that? How many years are we going to be told it needs X, but X never seems to start?
Personally Im of the type, I totally understand there are politics to play in every office, there is money contraints and all things on those level. Thats fine, thats pretty much anywhere you go. As are issues that arise when you look into building, or construction etc. However, after a certain point of inaction it becomes irrelevant to me because I dont see the initiative to resolve said issues. At the same time, I also find it disengenious (sp?) to continue market these projects as if they are within reach, to donors.....when in fact they may be 5-10 years or more away. As a donor, where is my money going exactly? Scholarships, travel, projects, the school etc etc? What is being improved in the Athletic Department and teams, coming from donor money for the AD specifically? I dont feel that is unreasonable to know. Add that, to the history of decisions of the AD over the past 10 years I feel concern is warranted in some of those areas.