I don’t think there’s as much of a gap as you might think. Football is on an island and accounts for the vast majority of NIL deals/compensation at the overall sport level. Outside of that, women’s basketball isn’t far behind men’s. On an individual level it really comes down to the brand power and value of the individual athlete, there are some women’s basketball players with NIL values in the millions that far exceed their male counterparts.I’m all for NIL. But schools are investing time and resources into NIL deals. All the big time schools have NIL directors. This is where Title 9 comes into question for me.
In theory, if a university employee helps secure a lucrative NIL agreement for a male athlete, it stands to reason that they should strive to secure a deal of equal value for female athletes. Is this happening?
A lot of insights here: https://biz.opendorse.com/nil-insights/