I've actually seen more flexibility from Hewitt this season than I ever expected when he was hired.
It took him longer to recognize our obvious defensive weaknesses than I would've liked, but he's at least been willing to play zone against several A-10 teams. He abandons it quicker than I'd like sometimes, but at least he's willing to try it.
He's also scrapped (for the most part) our "press" ... again recognizing that we just don't have the horses to press effectively without giving up layups and dunks.
And the supposed "up tempo" offense he talked about often after being hired has been replaced by an attack that can get out and run on rare occasions, but mostly relies on scoring in the halfcourt set.
So I don't know that I would trace our problems over the past 3 seasons to his stubbornness. I think he is trying to do some different things, many of which obviously go against his nature and the way he thinks successful teams are built.
I just don't think the guy is a very effective coach.
Regardless of their experience level, his players far too often look like they have no clue what he wants them to do or where they're supposed to be on the court. It generally takes his teams far too long to develop offensive cohesiveness, our defense is basically a sieve, and repeated failure in critical late-game situations has led to half a dozen soul-crushing losses.
Why that disconnect exists, I have no idea, but we have countless examples over the past 3 seasons to show that it does.
It took him longer to recognize our obvious defensive weaknesses than I would've liked, but he's at least been willing to play zone against several A-10 teams. He abandons it quicker than I'd like sometimes, but at least he's willing to try it.
He's also scrapped (for the most part) our "press" ... again recognizing that we just don't have the horses to press effectively without giving up layups and dunks.
And the supposed "up tempo" offense he talked about often after being hired has been replaced by an attack that can get out and run on rare occasions, but mostly relies on scoring in the halfcourt set.
So I don't know that I would trace our problems over the past 3 seasons to his stubbornness. I think he is trying to do some different things, many of which obviously go against his nature and the way he thinks successful teams are built.
I just don't think the guy is a very effective coach.
Regardless of their experience level, his players far too often look like they have no clue what he wants them to do or where they're supposed to be on the court. It generally takes his teams far too long to develop offensive cohesiveness, our defense is basically a sieve, and repeated failure in critical late-game situations has led to half a dozen soul-crushing losses.
Why that disconnect exists, I have no idea, but we have countless examples over the past 3 seasons to show that it does.