Are people on MasonHoops too thin skinned to handle criticisms of their own behavior from a fellow fan?
Now, think about how a player feels when you disrespect his coach.
Now, think about how a player feels when you disrespect his coach.
Give ME a break. We have heard time and time and time again on MasonHoops how the players are not all that thick-skinned.
Not long ago, I was formally asked to not talk about a player's adademic struggles on this forum because it bothered that player. And, now you say players who are thin skinned should not be playing D1 sports?
"...nothing to do with the players"? Players are supposed to have confidence in their coaches. If they don't then the whole system breaks down. When fans, a player's life's blood, undermine that confidence by expressing their opinions out loud and in ear-shot of the players then such fans are actively contributing to that breakdown. The only thing to be gained is making the team worse. Is that what you want?
I urge you to ask this same same question to a professional player and see what answer you get. Ask Brad. Ask Darryl Green. They are often available to many who participate in this forum.
Okay as far as the first point, that was something off the court that wasn't for public disclosure. That has nothing to do with on court performance.
Also, if you think that we are impacting the players confidence by yelling, we're just going to agree to disagree at this point. In fact, why are you even here debating it with us? What if they read what we write here? Perhaps you aren't helping by talking about how bad we are.
Also, why would we talk to professional athletes about how fans impact them? How is that even relevant to this conversation? This was supposed to be about how we are impacting or not impacting division 1 athletes at George Mason.
To me, you came in basically badmouthing fans for expressing displeasure and saying how wrong it is. This only creates more of a divide between the folks who think our men's basketball program is about graduating and being nice kids and the folks who want to win. I'm just about ready to peace out on my passion for the program because I have other things in life than rooting for a program that doesn't want to try and win when continuous poor and mediocre results are obvious. And if those folks who want to win leave, you'll be left with the folks ready to give hugs when the team continuously loses and say its ok.
Fact is man, if you think yelling for someone's head at George Mason is a big to do, we're going to agree to disagree and leave it at that.
by who?!?! average age of fans is probably about 65. Where are you getting the new folks?!?
These previous two pages pretty much sum up why these board are down to about 10 posters on repeat.... and the valuable updates on the state of the Miami hoops program.
Somebody call the cops, I think swimmom or Ms. Hicks have evidently kidnapped Jack Strop and taken over his MasonHoops.com account.
I only agree with this if you don't think AJ is responsible for his own shot selection. He came into tonight shooting 9 of 36 on two point jumpers. That's impossibly bad and it probably got worse after tonight. If he was only taking these with the shot clock winding down I wouldn't care as much but since it's his favorite shot it's a massive problem. He misses 3 out of 4 and we never get offensive rebounds off of them either. Very ready for him to either go to the basket strong or pass it off so he never takes one of those again.
I'm going to say this as simply as I can...
Rhetorical question: If you, at your job had 10 equally weighted goals to meet for the year, and you met or exceeded 9 of them, do you consider that a success? Do you meet every goal, every time, and within the timeframe expected? You're 90% effective, do you think you should be fired for not meeting all 10 goals? Are you a disappointment to your boss and got the organization?
The point is that winning is but one goal for a NCAA D1 Men's Basketball Program. Yes, to those on the outside (fans included), it happens to be the most visible goal, the most important goal. It also happens to be YOUR goal. It may not be the only goal of the organization or it's most important. If Coach Dave is meeting 90% of his goals, missing only the goal that YOU set for him is tough sh¡t for you. It's for YOU to deal with, not the program or the organization.
Therefore, for the Association of Future Athletic Directors of America (AFADA) who post incessantly on this forum and scream during games, "Fire Paulsen!", remember, it's tough sh!t for YOU. Make yourselves as miserable as you so desire.
Last post from me Jock because you are obviously living in a weird little bubble.I'm going to say this as simply as I can...
Rhetorical question: If you, at your job had 10 equally weighted goals to meet for the year, and you met or exceeded 9 of them, do you consider that a success? Do you meet every goal, every time, and within the timeframe expected? You're 90% effective, do you think you should be fired for not meeting all 10 goals? Are you a disappointment to your boss and got the organization?
The point is that winning is but one goal for a NCAA D1 Men's Basketball Program. Yes, to those on the outside (fans included), it happens to be the most visible goal, the most important goal. It also happens to be YOUR goal. It may not be the only goal of the organization or it's most important. If Coach Dave is meeting 90% of his goals, missing only the goal that YOU set for him is tough sh¡t for you. It's for YOU to deal with, not the program or the organization.
Therefore, for the Association of Future Athletic Directors of America (AFADA) who post incessantly on this forum and scream during games, "Fire Paulsen!", remember, it's tough sh!t for YOU. Make yourselves as miserable as you so desire.
What?? Did you go to Mason? Huh??I'm going to say this as simply as I can...
Rhetorical question: If you, at your job had 10 equally weighted goals to meet for the year, and you met or exceeded 9 of them, do you consider that a success? Do you meet every goal, every time, and within the timeframe expected? You're 90% effective, do you think you should be fired for not meeting all 10 goals? Are you a disappointment to your boss and got the organization?
The point is that winning is but one goal for a NCAA D1 Men's Basketball Program. Yes, to those on the outside (fans included), it happens to be the most visible goal, the most important goal. It also happens to be YOUR goal. It may not be the only goal of the organization or it's most important. If Coach Dave is meeting 90% of his goals, missing only the goal that YOU set for him is tough sh¡t for you. It's for YOU to deal with, not the program or the organization.
Therefore, for the Association of Future Athletic Directors of America (AFADA) who post incessantly on this forum and scream during games, "Fire Paulsen!", remember, it's tough sh!t for YOU. Make yourselves as miserable as you so desire.
"The 20% of our fan base that thinks like you are just sad people that don't have a competitive bone in their bodies and part of the reason we are the laughingstock (well 2nd laughingstock thanks Fordham) in the A10 year in year out"
This is the root of the problem. Competitiveness is not a bad thing, in fact its a great thing. If you are OK with mediocrity then you really have no business being involved in D1 athletics. Brad has played at the highest level of sport so he knows this all too well. Its time for him to make a move with DP or step aside and let someone else take over. Our flagship sport not being relevant for 10 years in inexcusable.....period.