And cornhole for the drunks and hacky sack for the potheads.
Good point. I think we've got it covered. Mason should hire all of us to run the athletic department.
And cornhole for the drunks and hacky sack for the potheads.
So, you are proposing adding 1 program (men's lacrosse) and eliminating 7 programs? But, you really only care about men's basketball.
BTW, am I the only one who strongly supports the retention of wrestling, which is in a good conference (Eastern Wrestling League) and has been successful recently in ticket sales and fundraising?
We should at least be honest on these boards. The Eastern Wrestling League is quite possibly the worst D-1 wrestling conference. We are in it because no other conference would take us. The EIWA would be a much better fit for us, but they had 0 interest in us joining their conference once CAA Wrestling disbanded.
Not only are we in this awful league, but we finished dead last in the conference championship a distant, distant last, 26 points out second-to-last. Let's be real here.
In the A10, only St. Bonaventure has the minimum number of sports (14) prescribed by the NCAA for D-1 schools (although Duquesne & vcu have just 15 each). GW has the most sports (24). Here is the list of A10 schools (including Davidson which will be joining in July) with the corresponding number of sports:
Davidson - 19
Dayton - 17
Duquesne - 15
Fordham - 20
Mason - 20
GW - 24
LaSalle -20
UMass - 19
Rhode Island - 16
Richmond - 16
St. Bonaventure - 14
St. Joseph's - 18
St. Louis - 16
vcu - 15
If the majority of collegiate athletic departments are run like a "corporation" as Patriot Lawdog states, wouldn't you expect more A10 schools to have the minimum 14 sports? Interestingly, Davidson has 19 sports (including non-scholarship football) with an enrollment under 2,000.
The A-10 isn't a good sample because it's dominated by private schools, most of which don't run their athletic departments as corporations. Other than basketball, athletics at a school like Davidson is seen as part of the educational mission.
That doesn't mean Lawdog's point was incorrect.
If you're in one of the big-time football conferences, you can run your AD like a corporation and still afford to fund more than the minimum number of sports teams because of football revenue.
Since we don't have football, and our prez is committed to keeping student fees reasonably low, we have to be smarter and more calculating about where we invest our athletics funding.
If you're in one of the big-time football conferences, you can run your AD like a corporation and still afford to fund more than the minimum number of sports teams because of football revenue.
This is true of my alma mater (Penn State), which has 29 sports.
Yep, and with the exception of football, men's basketball and wrestling, all of them lose money.
Not sure their men's basketball team really makes money ) unless you are talking abou NCAA payouts earned by other Big 10 schools. Their wrestling team out draws their basketball team
They also just started hockey which has been very popular.
Yes, I'm about 99.9 percent sure that every Big Ten men's basketball program makes money. You don't have to draw much to cover 13 scholarships, 3 coaches and a few support personnel, especially when you get a cut of the conference's NCAA money every year whether you win or lose.
We're broke. That's the truth. we need more money brought in, somehow, someway.
Cold, hard facts people.
We're broke. That's the truth. we need more money brought in, somehow, someway.
Cold, hard facts people.
Are you saying that the AD is projecting a deficit (i.e., expenses exceed revenues) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014? BTW, see the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the prior fiscal year - http://www.apa.virginia.gov/reports/GMUNCAA2013.pdf.
Are you saying that the AD is projecting a deficit (i.e., expenses exceed revenues) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014? BTW, see the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the prior fiscal year - http://www.apa.virginia.gov/reports/GMUNCAA2013.pdf.