I see you have dropped the argument that I am making up the budget issues at Mason and that it is bad optics to arguing it wont last long. I guess you agree, at least, with the optics part...
OK, I'll bite. I have no idea who would write it, I have a hard time predicting crazy that many levels deep. It wouldn't have to be a sports beat writer, though. A disgruntled Mason staff member who has had their pay cut could reach out to a writer at the Post, say. The current target of everyone's hate reporting will be long gone by March and they will be hunting for more scalps. Iona isn't in as woke a place as Mason. Mason is just minutes from one of the most woke cities in the world during a time of ever increasing wokeness and cancel culture.
It is the fear that the article could be written and your career canceled that could keep people from firing Paulsen at the end of the year given the circumstances. So, Brad can fight to have Dave at the end of this year and risk the bad optics or take the easy path and just wait for his contract to end a year later. So, Brad can avoid all risk at almost zero cost to him but the loss of 1 year of delay in getting a new coach. Can you name anything that Brad has done in his tenure that had any amount of risk associated with it?
From Brad's point of view, I don't see the upside for pushing for a buy out of Paulsen's contract at the end of the season. I guess hope is that his competitive nature is as strong as he has told us it is.