A plus post @EXpatriot13
We all keep bringing this up over and over again, and honestly for good reason. We should be frustrated at the previous administration's negligence in not capitalizing on our FF run, despite the fact that it's been 12+ years. Merten and the AD brutally failed at re-investing in our program and modernizing our marketing and brand proposition.
Our frustration should be shown and used to fuel this administration's commitment to our basketball program. The practice facility is half complete, the locker rooms are well on their way, decent gains on the court. We've seen some improvement, we need more. I think the program really struggles with marketing and communications. If you walk around campus (granted, I haven't been on campus in 4 years so this might have changed) you wouldn't even really know that we HAVE a basketball team, let alone one that has made the Final Four. It's our flagship sport, they should be showing it off and branding it all over the place (in places that make sense). In the age of social media, they should be blasting out picture updates of their new locker rooms, renderings of the potential practice facility addition, show the players hanging out on campus together and taking advantage of the many campus-side upgrades we've seen over the years - recruits are on social media and that's the #1 way to connect with them these days. They need to turn Mason Basketball, not Mason Athletics, into its own brand. These are things that don't require incremental budget.
Again, we've seen improvement - but we need to see more. I long for the day where people don't just say "oh yea, didn't they make the Final Four awhile back?", but instead say "oh yea, they made the Final Four and also did X, Y and Z."
I think you are correct:I don't think they have to report what their private fundraising arm chips in to pay Roy..I'm thinking it's just the public funds that have to be reported.
Great idea.I work at ASU and there is not a whole lot of visible marketing on campus of any of their teams. There is a student-run group, though, whose sole job is to drive student attendance at all the sports games
Great idea.
Current students are future season ticket holders. Maybe we send Zach out to ASU to find out more.
You say that until Mason does Mason things and sends us an e-mail asking us for $300 to celebrate our KenPom ranking.I would love to see Mason do something similar.
You say that until Mason does Mason things and sends us an e-mail asking us for $300 to celebrate our KenPom ranking.
So, I am going purely off memory on this topic, so maybe I am missing something, but I am beginning to feel like Brad has plateaued. I feel like he came in and took care of the low hanging fruit that O’Connor never grabbed. While compared to TOC, he is stellar, you cant ride on that comparison forever.So, I think most of us are on board with the hiring of Dave Paulsen (even though some of us are taking a wait and see approach).
At George Mason, mens basketball is the bell cow, and hiring the right guy is one of the more important duties of an AD.
Does anybody have strong feelings about the job he's done otherwise? I remember when he came in, his supposed expertise was in fundraising. Has that improved?
How about involvement with the community/alumni/fanbase?
These are not rhetorical questions, I genuinely haven't paid close enough attention to know, and I'd love to hear the insight of those who have.
I think 1700 days is long enough to have established a heading, and I'm curious if people are happy with the heading.
So are you of the opinion that Brad has established himself as "competent, but not exceptional"?So, I am going purely off memory on this topic, so maybe I am missing something, but I am beginning to feel like Brad has plateaued. I feel like he came in and took care of the low hanging fruit that O’Connor never grabbed. While compared to TOC, he is stellar, you cant ride on that comparison forever.
I feel like he has taken steps forward but nothing has been eye popping. Getting rid of the Virus (1 year late), patriot center naming rights, a budget version of a practice facility and some obvious improvements to the Patriot Center (lights, video board and locker room refurb-almost done if he can get about 5 more dollars after giving day).
I was really hoping for some more significant movement on fundraising by now, but maybe that is asking too much.
That is where I am leaning, but open to be convinced otherwise.So are you of the opinion that Brad has established himself as "competent, but not exceptional"?
The M in GMU stands for Mediocre. And it's not Brad or DP's fault.
It’s mostly our own fail (our being Mason alumni), but also the community writ-large around it. We’ve never gotten the kind of support we need to be upper echelon — not like vcu or Gonzaga or Butler or Wichita State or Creighton or Dayton, that’s for sure.
The M in GMU stands for Mediocre. And it's not Brad or DP's fault.
Disagree to some extent. Young school with limitless elite academic options in an ideal location. Chasing R-1 status, Schar Public Policy, Amazon, elite level law school, 3 campuses, infra-structure needs for future growth, cost of living stress on employee retention and recruitment, etc. Too young with too many options and they’re all jammed up with the possibilities. Not enough money to do everything and Athletics is not a top priority. Important, but not a priority.
It’s an interesting question about our academics, because we seem to be following more the New American University model rather than the Public Ivy model. It’ll be interesting to see what that looks like long-term. There are things I like about it and things I don’t.
As for not enough money to do everything, we aren’t a football school for this very reason. We don’t need that much more money to be top tier, but a few things are holding us back (too many sports is one), outdated infrastructure is another (other than the new RAC and Aquatic Center notwithstanding). I know Edwards has been focusing on facilities, but we need to, a, get a separate track facility and completely redo our soccer stadium and, b, finish the baseball renovations, and, c, figure out what we are going to do with our current basketball arena and announce a long-term plan so we can start raising funds for it now.
Good discussion. I believe however, there are hundreds of millions required to support a top-tier research institution. Will it happen here? I believe it can, but the bandwidth of the focus and temptations available in this region need to be tightened or there will too many mouths to feed for an institution this young.
The interesting thing to me is that Mason has made such rapid progress in many areas that most alumni don’t know about (and wouldn’t care if they did), but steadfastly refuses to throw money at the one program — men’s basketball — that has put the university on the map more than any other.
I was thinking about this yesterday. While vcu has a world-class med school and renowned arts program, their identity is most closely associated with basketball.
What is Mason’s identity? It could be one of any number of things. But it sure ain’t basketball.