Updated what? NET?
Part 1 - checkIf Mason wants a shot at an at-large, we are going to need an 11-2 OOC record and no worse than a 15-3 A10 record with a championship game appearance.
Part 1 - check
14-4 (with the wins you mentioned and avoiding bad losses), reach the A-10 finals and gotta believe we’re in.I think Mason could finish 14-4 in this A10 and still get an at-large (provided two of those wins are against Dayton and St. Joes and none of the losses are against the 200+ NET teams).
14-4 (with the wins you mentioned and avoiding bad losses), reach the A-10 finals and gotta believe we’re in.
That would be 27-7 in the 8th-ranked conference.
No sweat lol.
keep hope alive!Oh. I don’t think we will finish 14-4, but there is hope given all our tough games are at home and we only return St. Joes as projected top 4/5 teams.
I think more realistically 11-7 or 10-8 depending on how those tough home games go (Dayton, vcu, Duquesne, Bona, St. Joes).
There is a difference between "gone" and "unlikely". A lot of people said the same thing in 2011 and we earned an 8 seed.The goal for this season absolutely has to be top four in the A10 and see what happens in the tourney. At large is gone. No statement win means that anyone other than Dayton and SJU is a season ending landmine.
Exactly - a team that finishes with a 14-4 or better conference record is going to have a ton of quality winsThis is not the A10 of the last 2-3 years. Not too many land mines in the conference (that is at/large killing losses).
There are 7 teams in the top 100 and 2 more within the top 135, which are Q2 road games.
Hell, Mason is entering conference play with an NET of 72, which makes us a Q1 opportunity for teams that come I to EBA.
hell yea! top 50 next!NET ranking went up from 74 to 66