So extrapolating it out, 99, at what point does the "cheering" stop and the accountability begin?
I'm not trying to be a jerk, I'm asking seriously.
Where's the threshold? How many losses are enough before we're no longer "disloyal" for wanting our well-paid coach to do his job well?
It's a fair question. Here's my take. In his GMU tenure Hewitt has had virtually the same backcourt for all 80+ games and following one season with some great senior frontcourt players he's had a pretty bare cupboard up front with the exception of a young Jenkins.
Sherrod, BA and CE to me are ok college basketball players. Sherrod has never shown me an ability to make anyone else on the court better, BA is an athletic freak who for 3 years has made poor decisions and CE... well, just makes me resent Shane Larkin. I personally don't thnk John Wooden would make a backcourt of those 3 a NCAA tournament team. Now, is Hewitt blameless? Of course not, but it's amazing how quickly the natives grabbed their pitchforks to run this guy out of town when to me all that's been proven is that we have a pretty average or below average group of juniors and seniors.
So to me, while to some it's the death penalty to our program, I'll judge him once he has a team on the court of guys he chose to play for him. I think personally next year we'll be improved some, but will also have probably the worst senior class we've seen at Mason in 15 years, so my expectations will be tempered then as well.
And enough of the loyalty stuff. While I appreciate someone saying I said that, again I question no one's loyalty. You guys spend a LOT of time and energy on GMU hoops, your loyalty is not at all in question and I'm certainly not interested in being the one to judge if it is.