As a musician, when I was picking what college to go to, I took lessons and visited with a lot of different teachers to try and find the right fit. In the end I picked Mason because I thought the teacher there would be tough on me...enough to motivate me to practice and turn into a professional player. He absolutely was the right guy for that, but he pushed me too hard in ways I didn't like, and I wound up shifting away from music altogether.
When I look back, though, had I gone to a different school and studied with a teacher who was more lenient, I probably wouldn't have quit—and probably would have wound up sticking with music but not being very successful, because I don't have the drive to get good enough to play professionally.
I had enough talent to be a decent college player, but never was interested in putting in the time and doing the stuff I didn't want to do that would have ultimately gotten me to the next level. Then again, maybe a different teacher at a different school would have found a way to motivate me enough to do those things. Who knows...all I know now is that I gave up on a dream because my choices led me to a point where it wasn't my dream anymore.
I figure that's pretty similar to what a lot of college athletes face as well. Pauslen clearly had an eye for talent, and was capable in many instances of bringing high quality talent to Mason. I figure, though, that he and his staff couldn't motivate or push them to make a big jump once they got here. I don't think he didn't try, I just think something about the mix was off. Clearly if you look at Mike Muscala you can prove that Paulsen can develop talent, but after 5 years he wasn't recreating that with anyone at Mason.
At the end of the day it just turned out to not be a good fit. His reluctance to leverage the transfer portal showed he was lagging behind the times, but his inability to create success out of those rosters kinda shows that this wasn't the place for him. I think he was a great guy and fine coach, but whatever his strategy and approach was to talent development (and in-game coaching) just wasn't what our players needed.
In the end we experienced a mountain of talent drain, and you point to the kids going to other schools (or staying, like Oduro, and working with a new coach) and making these huge jumps as proof that Paulsen couldn't get it together. And that's correct...he couldn't. But don't discount the kids moving on from that situation and, clearly, finding a new one that worked better for them. They weren't getting what they needed from Paulsen to be the best players they could be. No sense in thinking about all the "what ifs" because they aren't real...it wasn't going to happen with Paulsen at the helm.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk.