A.-Siegfried
Starter
Larry Williams was one of AD's that helped break up the Big East went it all went south.
Iowa St vs Iowa currently on ESPNU. Iowa, a 2 pt underdog on the road, is ahead by 5 in the first half. The announcer said that all 5 Iowa St starters can shoot the 3 (might discourage the use of a zone) although they're only 2-7 on 3s in this game.
My faith in gmu bball wants me to believe we can win this but the reality is well probably get spanked like OU did us.
Sent from my Lumia 900 using Tapatalk
Looking at the bracket, not sure how G Mas wins a single game in this tourney. However, there is a good chance POTUS will swing by and catch some action for whatever that is worth.
Obama and Hewitt are similar in some ways. Both are likable and appear to be good guys. Both have gotten to their current positions based on likability and salesmanship, not on achievement or competency.
It's times like these where I wish our Athletic Department had some sort of consistent behind the scenes video episodes or interviews with the players/coaches/alumni of the program, etc. Something to keep us engaged during a time like this, despite how poorly we've been playing.
The athletic department has 24 sports to worry about on top of everything else they have to do . We can't really expect them to constantly feed the appetites of us basketball fans with new content every day.
Big time programs, at least up in the tri-state area, all have basketball programs on the sports channels like SNY and MSG. I'm not asking for something every single day or nearly as in-depth as the big boys. A video feature story/interview/recap once a week wouldn't take a lot of effort. Something to engage the fans on a slow week of hoops or during long breaks like this. Then again, minimal effort is a lot of effort for George Mason basketball.
Why would they? And I'm not just trying to be a negative jerk, either. Seriously, why would they? Would it really help their bottom line at all to have more Mason coverage?You are right, though, none of the people who are covering us right now are doing enough.
Why would they? And I'm not just trying to be a negative jerk, either. Seriously, why would they? Would it really help their bottom line at all to have more Mason coverage?
Why would they? And I'm not just trying to be a negative jerk, either. Seriously, why would they? Would it really help their bottom line at all to have more Mason coverage?
Why would they? And I'm not just trying to be a negative jerk, either. Seriously, why would they? Would it really help their bottom line at all to have more Mason coverage?