If true, it would be the 4th player suspended this season.
Ahhh you’re right. I thought it was just Jordan and Malik. Forgot about Otis.
If true, it would be the 4th player suspended this season.
She’s makes about as much sense as me.So wait, I'm confused, his mom is going to come up to Virginia and just be like lonzo Ball's dad or something? Just heckle paulsen during the games or something?
They call that a redshirt I believeI mean, at least he’s not Malik Henry who couldn’t get in even when the entire front court besides him fouled out of the game.
So wait, I'm confused, his mom is going to come up to Virginia and just be like lonzo Ball's dad or something? Just heckle paulsen during the games or something?
Lol, damnit that's funnyShe’s makes about as much sense as me.
They call that a redshirt I believe
Perhaps, she plans to drive him home.
You can play a limited amount of time and still receive a redshirt.not when you’ve already played. But I also don’t really advocate throwing a freshman who hasn’t played in 3 games plus quarantine in a game in the second OT, but still.
Short of pulling down his pants and pooping on Paulsens clipboard, I can’t see a 4 game suspension being legit.
You can play a limited amount of time and still receive a redshirt.
If Dave is the disciplinarian he portends to be, why put Green back in the game at all? Is it because the infraction wasn’t that bad, or was it more likely that he was so desperate for a win that he sacrificed his principles?
What kind of message does that send to the team when a punishment — justified or not — ends out of necessity and not contrition?
Do you remember the moment when Gene Hackman won the respect of his team in Hoosiers? When he went with only four players despite having a fifth player available who had been punished and said to the ref, “My team’s on the court.”
I don't like to question a "fan", but did you mean "portends" or "pretends"?
If Dave is the disciplinarian he appears to be, why put Green back in the game at all? Is it because the infraction wasn’t that bad, or was it more likely that he was so desperate for a win that he sacrificed his principles?
What kind of message does that send to the team when a punishment — justified or not — ends out of necessity and not contrition?
Do you remember the moment when Gene Hackman won the respect of his team in Hoosiers? When he went with only four players despite having a fifth player available who had been punished and said to the ref, “My team’s on the court.”
Could you imagine going to a 3rd OT because you refused to put Javon back in?
I meant to type “pretends” and it got autocorrected, but now that sounds a little harsh. Let me know if “appears” works better for you.
I mean, at least he’s not Malik Henry who couldn’t get in even when the entire front court besides him fouled out of the game.
He and Otis were still suspended