I'll say something.
So Paulsen says this is the 2nd half of a 2 year plan.
Year 1: we have a chance to finish top 4 and we let richmond blow us out at home.
Year 2: chance to finish top 4 and we get blown this game and lose our homecoming game.
What has changed Paulsen?
If anything that should be a good enough reason to can his a**.
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
Losing this game is excusable. Winning in the road is hard and it’s tough. Losing as many home games as we have over his tenure is not. I’d include Davidson this year in that category. No excuse to lose against Davidson when they were shooting as badly as they did. Duquesne too.
Ignorance is blissThe ignore button is this sites best function
Unfortunately DP plays his favorites.I’m starting to wonder if Kier might not deserve to lose his starting spot to Hartwell at this point. He makes so many boneheaded plays at the worst times in games (turnover with a minute left and us down by just 2 possessions, for instance).
Next year, depending on how Mar looks, I could see Hartwell starting at the 1 and Miller and Mar crowding Kier out of the starting lineup.
He was so good to start conference play, but for whatever reason he has not been able to sustain that level over an entire season yet. Maybe his senior year will be different.
Yep. Totally agree. We could easily absorb a loss like this other the one to SBU and even Richmond if we protected the home court.Losing this game is excusable. Winning in the road is hard and it’s tough. Losing as many home games as we have over his tenure is not. I’d include Davidson this year in that category. No excuse to lose against Davidson when they were shooting as badly as they did. Duquesne too.
The irony here is overwhelmingIgnorance is bliss
Yep. Totally agree. We could easily absorb a loss like this other the one to SBU and even Richmond if we protected the home court.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk