I thought they misrepresented TS% slightly, but Hollinger is a demigod of basketball analysis so it's much more likely that I'm the asshole.
TS% is a measure of shooting effectiveness that incorporates FT%. The only difference between TS% and effective FG% is that TS% bakes in FTs and eFG does not. TS% is designed to be a pure metric to measure how well someone shoots, while eFG weights 2s and 3s proportionally, which makes it a much more useful efficiency metric than raw FG%.
Last night Hollinger said that TS% is better because it bakes in how often you get to the line, which to my knowledge is only sort of correct (more FTs = more weight in the metric), and then said that Mason is a better eFG% team but since we don't get to the line that much we're a worse TS% team. That part is wrong. According to college-basketball-reference were sitting at 57.1% TS and 54.9% eFG.
If Hollinger was looking to explain the delta between our eFG (24th in the country) and overall offensive efficiency (85th), he should have mentioned the really low offensive rebound rate and our low FT/FGA rate. He sort of got there but in a roundabout way that was kind of confusing and partially wrong.
I loved the broadcast overall just thought this part was noteworthy.