So money. Got it!There used to be a system of incentives under the old RPI model based around tge average RPI of your OOC opponents, but it sounds like that’s gone. Maybe it’s win percentage now?
So money. Got it!There used to be a system of incentives under the old RPI model based around tge average RPI of your OOC opponents, but it sounds like that’s gone. Maybe it’s win percentage now?
TEAM | PTS. |
---|---|
1. Kansas (30) | 1,449 |
2. Alabama (14) | 1,428 |
3. UConn (11) | 1,345 |
4. Houston (4) | 1,343 |
5. Iowa State | 1,177 |
6. Gonzaga (1) | 1,157 |
7. Duke | 1,154 |
8. Baylor | 1,109 |
9. North Carolina | 1,037 |
10. Arizona | 905 |
11. Auburn | 901 |
12. Tennessee | 775 |
13. Texas A&M | 737 |
14. Purdue | 678 |
15. Creighton | 631 |
16. Arkansas | 625 |
17. Indiana | 492 |
18. Marquette | 484 |
19. Texas | 332 |
20. Cincinnati | 271 |
21. Florida | 249 |
22. UCLA | 210 |
23. Kentucky | 191 |
24. Ole Miss | 132 |
25. Rutgers | 102 |
ran the KenPom averagesKenpm preseason rankings of our opponentsView attachment 2406
View attachment 2407
View attachment 2408
255 | 255 |
22 | 22 |
267 | 267 |
268 | 268 |
126 | 126 |
363 | 363 |
194 | 364 |
188 | 194 |
2 | 188 |
192 | 2 |
266 | 192 |
125 | 266 |
122 | 125 |
139 | 122 |
117 | 139 |
27 | 117 |
146 | 27 |
123 | 146 |
79 | 123 |
125 | 79 |
146 | 125 |
122 | 146 |
105 | 122 |
86 | 105 |
41 | 86 |
164 | 41 |
143 | 164 |
167 | 143 |
139 | 167 |
139 | |
Average | Average |
Not including Ferrum College | Includes Ferrum College as 364 |
146.86 | 154.10 |
Don't love the idea of finishing 10-8 in conference play. Doesn't scream top 4 double bye to me.
Kenpom projected A10 records don't mean too much especially before the season even starts. He has Loyola and St Joe's at 11-7 tied for 3rd/4th. We're next, alone as 5th. So at least we're contending for top 4.10-8 is what Duquesne finished last season. They finished 6th. UMass finished 4th at 11-7.
We should shoot for 12-6 (which is one win better than our best A10 finish). But the league is going to be deeper this year than the last time we finished 11-7.
I have never been able to confirm just how much a 'tad' is, in measurement.We might score a tad more than Ken is projecting.
I'm thinking 8 to 10pts more.I have never been able to confirm just how much a 'tad' is, in measurement.
Is it more than a smidge or a tidbit? Or is it in line with a dash or a hint?
Enquiring minds want to know!
It’s a little less than a skosh.I have never been able to confirm just how much a 'tad' is, in measurement.
Is it more than a smidge or a tidbit? Or is it in line with a dash or a hint?
Enquiring minds want to know!
I don't see any reason, based on the cumulative talent, experience, scoring and defensive abilities of these players, that we can't hope to have a shot at dancing.It feels like it has been so long since we have played more than 2 games in the conference tourney that I would be happy with making it to the weekend at this point. Snagging a NIT invite would be an incredible accomplishment. We aren't dancing this year or any time in the near future.
I can understand your hesitancy to buy in although I believe we will end up surprising you. I'm basing some of my optimism on comments that Tony has made to go along with what @Verdad posted above.It feels like it has been so long since we have played more than 2 games in the conference tourney that I would be happy with making it to the weekend at this point. Snagging a NIT invite would be an incredible accomplishment. We aren't dancing this year or any time in the near future.
Did you look for GMTM?Just perused the CBS Sports 100+1. Did not see George Mason. Hmmm...