Hopefully this means Kier will automatically be eligible
https://247sports.com/college/kentu...ligibility-to-some-discussing-more-144994142/
https://247sports.com/college/kentu...ligibility-to-some-discussing-more-144994142/
Hopefully this means Kier will automatically be eligible
https://247sports.com/college/kentu...ligibility-to-some-discussing-more-144994142/
https://247sports.com/college/kentu...ligibility-to-some-discussing-more-144994142/
Basketball is a winter sport, so no real answers there.
What are they going to do with all the incoming freshmen this might effect next year? Looks like they're thinking of relaxing the scholarship limits for next year?
I wonder
assuming additional eligibility is given for Men's Basketball
1) total costs are huge - $25k-$50k x 347 Division 1 Schools
2) costs across all Division levels and schools and all sports?
3) expand men's bball roster to 15-17?
How many take up the offer?
1) if first round NBA contracts are guaranteed - then the top 15-20 players will not return?
2) how many players aren't academically eligible as they planned on dropping out right after the season ended?
3) how many players want to move onto other paid basketball opportunities - foreign or G-League?
4) how many non star players with no professional basketball opportunities want to graduate and get on with their career/professional lives?
5) what is the effect on the grad transfer market?
If you are the NCAA, what do you do with teams like GW, AU, Georgetown, etc whose seasons were over before all the cancellations? Those seniors finished their careers. Do you allow them to come back or is it just for schools who hadnt yet lost?
Theoretically in basketball terms, if all teams are allowed to bring back the seniors for one year, doesn’t that mean Mason will finish relatively at the same place we did this year?
Dayton should be the only team that loses out significantly because Obi Toppin will most likely go pro, but the rest of the A10 will remain the same ..... theoritaclly.
Couldn't they simply state that any current seniors who get their eligbility extended because of COVID 19 would not count against the existing scholarship limit next year?I can’t see the NCAA allowing teams to go over the scholarship limit to allow seniors to come back, no way to apply it fairly across the board.
Couldn't they simply state that any current seniors who get their eligbility extended because of COVID 19 would not count against the existing scholarship limit next year?
Yes. But think of a team with seven seniors and a team with zero? In basketball terms that is one team with 20 players versus another with 13.
Took the words out of my mouth. Every team with 0-2 seniors would be crying foul. Would completely screw up the landscape for incoming recruits who may have been told they would be getting major minutes due to graduation, guys who have spent years coming up behind the guys who are currently seniors, etc. would be a lot of ripples from letting an entire graduating class come back across the NCAA.
Good point. I guess I was thinking that just because a senior has eligibility it doesn't necessarily mean a school has to bring them back. If a school wanted to being someone back, they would have to accept the cost and/or team chemistry issues that may arise from lack of playing time. It seems that's the best anyone can do in this situation.Took the words out of my mouth. Every team with 0-2 seniors would be crying foul. Would completely screw up the landscape for incoming recruits who may have been told they would be getting major minutes due to graduation, guys who have spent years coming up behind the guys who are currently seniors, etc. would be a lot of ripples from letting an entire graduating class come back across the NCAA.
Yes. But think of a team with seven seniors and a team with zero? In basketball terms that is one team with 20 players versus another with 13.